3d rectangular bounding box Search Results


3d rectangular bounding box  (Oxford Instruments)
99
Oxford Instruments 3d rectangular bounding box
Cell spreading and focal adhesion clustering are enhanced with moderate network plasticity. (A) Representative maximum intensity projection images of MSCs encapsulated within 3.6-kPa (initial modulus) alginate gels with different plasticity. Green represents actin, blue represents the nucleus, and red represents FAK kinase. Confocal images were taken after 3 d in culture. (B) Quantification of the cell aspect ratio, as defined by the <t>3D</t> <t>rectangular</t> bounding <t>box’s</t> longest side divided by its shortest side. (C) Quantification of the nuclear aspect ratio, as defined by the 3D rectangular bounding box’s longest side divided by its shortest side, showing no significant difference between the conditions. (D) Cellular volume as measured per cell using Imaris Image Analysis software. (E) Representative images of focal adhesions between different binding PEG. (Scale bar, 5 µm.) (F) Histograms of focal adhesion spacing in 3D space, as based on the nearest neighbor distances for k = 4 neighbors. ANOVA analysis resulted in P < 0.001. (G) Cell spreading in gels of Young’s moduli of 1.1, 3.4, and 8 kPa, respectively, as measured by nanoindentation and varying levels of plasticity. *P < 0.1, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, n.s., not significant.
3d Rectangular Bounding Box, supplied by Oxford Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+rectangular+bounding+box/Imaris/pmc07584996-86-46-74
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d rectangular bounding box - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Cell spreading and focal adhesion clustering are enhanced with moderate network plasticity. (A) Representative maximum intensity projection images of MSCs encapsulated within 3.6-kPa (initial modulus) alginate gels with different plasticity. Green represents actin, blue represents the nucleus, and red represents FAK kinase. Confocal images were taken after 3 d in culture. (B) Quantification of the cell aspect ratio, as defined by the 3D rectangular bounding box’s longest side divided by its shortest side. (C) Quantification of the nuclear aspect ratio, as defined by the 3D rectangular bounding box’s longest side divided by its shortest side, showing no significant difference between the conditions. (D) Cellular volume as measured per cell using Imaris Image Analysis software. (E) Representative images of focal adhesions between different binding PEG. (Scale bar, 5 µm.) (F) Histograms of focal adhesion spacing in 3D space, as based on the nearest neighbor distances for k = 4 neighbors. ANOVA analysis resulted in P < 0.001. (G) Cell spreading in gels of Young’s moduli of 1.1, 3.4, and 8 kPa, respectively, as measured by nanoindentation and varying levels of plasticity. *P < 0.1, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, n.s., not significant.

Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Article Title: Extracellular matrix plasticity as a driver of cell spreading

doi: 10.1073/pnas.2008801117

Figure Lengend Snippet: Cell spreading and focal adhesion clustering are enhanced with moderate network plasticity. (A) Representative maximum intensity projection images of MSCs encapsulated within 3.6-kPa (initial modulus) alginate gels with different plasticity. Green represents actin, blue represents the nucleus, and red represents FAK kinase. Confocal images were taken after 3 d in culture. (B) Quantification of the cell aspect ratio, as defined by the 3D rectangular bounding box’s longest side divided by its shortest side. (C) Quantification of the nuclear aspect ratio, as defined by the 3D rectangular bounding box’s longest side divided by its shortest side, showing no significant difference between the conditions. (D) Cellular volume as measured per cell using Imaris Image Analysis software. (E) Representative images of focal adhesions between different binding PEG. (Scale bar, 5 µm.) (F) Histograms of focal adhesion spacing in 3D space, as based on the nearest neighbor distances for k = 4 neighbors. ANOVA analysis resulted in P < 0.001. (G) Cell spreading in gels of Young’s moduli of 1.1, 3.4, and 8 kPa, respectively, as measured by nanoindentation and varying levels of plasticity. *P < 0.1, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, n.s., not significant.

Article Snippet: Confocal images were taken after 3 d in culture. ( B ) Quantification of the cell aspect ratio, as defined by the 3D rectangular bounding box’s longest side divided by its shortest side. ( C ) Quantification of the nuclear aspect ratio, as defined by the 3D rectangular bounding box’s longest side divided by its shortest side, showing no significant difference between the conditions. ( D ) Cellular volume as measured per cell using Imaris Image Analysis software. ( E ) Representative images of focal adhesions between different binding PEG. (Scale bar, 5 µm.) ( F ) Histograms of focal adhesion spacing in 3D space, as based on the nearest neighbor distances for k = 4 neighbors.

Techniques: Software, Binding Assay